BF3 Vs. MW3?

Two critically acclaimed games, both superior in their series display an important message about government. The resolve of the American government will not be tested, nor will the opposition's government as well. That is why we have war. Our individual cause is just, and we stick through it to the end. The integrity of our resolve will be maintained in its entirety. Or will it? Remember, we are only human. Humans make up everything we are and operate. Corporations, government, etc. So just bear in mind that no matter how inferior or superior a government may seem, "you will find the will of a single man, can be broken" (Modern Warfare 3). The two games, both of which include different, yet significant events that occur in the world, represent how the government almost always intervenes to stop some sort of world catastrophe. The government tends to do this in silence, without letting much of the public know. Without playing these violent, yet insightful games, I may have never found just how brutal the government is to reach end's meet. We all have a story to tell, and the government's clear depiction is to let the world know that our power and advancements in technological warfare will face the threat of those who are willing to abuse the government by initiating offensives against society. Tango down.